MOTION

MOTION

The term 'motion' when used in terms of the legislature, means any proposal submitted to the House for seeking its decision. Every matter is determined in the House by means of a question put from the Chair on a motion moved by a member and resolved either in the affirmative or negative. Motions are thus the basis of all legislative proceedings and through its adoption or rejection the House ascertains its own will.

Rule 107 of the Delhi Assembly Rules lays down that no discussion on a matter of public interest shall take place except on a motion moved witht the consent of the Speaker

Notice of the Motion: All notices are to be addressed to the Assembly Secretary. However, the Speaker may allow the following Motions without notice:

            (i)    Motion for condolence or congratulation;

           (ii)     Motion for adjournment of a sitting;

          (iii)     Motion for a withdrawal of strangers;

          (iv)     Motion for electing members to Committees;

           (v)     Motion for withdrawal of a Bill, resolution or a motion or amendments thereto;

          (vi)     Motion for postponement of any business;

         (vii)     Motion for closure of debate;

         (viii)    Motion for suspension of a rule; and

           (ix)    Motion to extend duration of a sitting.

Conditions of Admissibility of a Motion: The general rule regarding motions is that a motion must not raise a question substantially identical with one on which the House has already given a decision within six months from the date of disposal of such a motion or when it's decision is still pending (Ruel 115). A Motion should satisfy the following conditions to be admissible (Rule 109):

           (i)    It shall raise substantially only one definite issue of recent occurrence :

          (ii)    It shall not contain arguments, inferences, ironical expressions, imputations or defamatory statements;

          (iii)   It shall not refer to the conduct or character of persons except in their public capacity;

         (iv)   It shall not raise a question of privilege;

          (v)  It shall not revive discussion on a matter which has been discussed in the same session or within the preceding six months, whichever is earlier;

          (vi)   It shall not anticipate a matter which is to be discussed in the same session; and

         (vii)    It shall not relate to any matter which is under adjudication by a court of law having jurisdiction in any part of India.

         (viii)   It shall not ordinarily relate to a matter under consideration    of a House Committee.

          (ix)   It shall not raise a matter which is not primarily the concern of the Government.

Procedure for moving a Motion:  On being called by the Speaker, the first member in whose name the motion stands in the List of Business formally moves the motion and makes his speech. Other members can also participate in the debate and move amendments if any (the purpose of an amendment is either to modify a question before the House with a view to make it acceptable or propose a different alternative to the House). The  concerned Minister replies to the debate. After the members and Minister concerned have participated in the debate, the mover of the motion may exercise his right to reply. thereafter the amendments are put to vote and disposed of. Finally,  the Speaker, places the main motion before the House for voting.

Government Motions: Government motions get precedence over private members' motions as they are discussed in Government time. When notices of Government and Private members are received on the same subject, the Government motion gets precedence and it alone is admitted.

The following Motions (under Rule 107)have been adopted by the Delhi Assembly till date:

 

Fourth Assembly

S.No. Date Session

Name of the mover

Text of the Motion adopted by the House

Remarks

01  

2nd

Kunwar Karan Singh " This House recommends amendment in the section 13(4) of the Government of NCT of Delhi Act, 1991 making quorum requirement 1/4 in place of 1/3 so that precious floor time could be saved to discuss the problem of the people of Delhi"  

 

Third Assembly

S.No. Date Session

Name of the mover

Text of the Motion adopted by the House

Remarks

01 26.07.2004

2nd

Shri Amrish Singh Gautam

"This House demands that the requirement in the application form for issue of SC/ST Certificates regarding the arrival and residence in Delhi since 1951 be done away with and such certificates be issued to all those who are residing in Delhi since their birth or for five years."

"This House also demands that all persons belonging to the SC/ST community by treated equally and opportunity be provided to them by the Delhi Government in employment, education and others schemes as is being done by the Central Government".

 
02 27.07.2004

2nd

Shri Mukesh Sharma "This House resolves and strongly recommends to the Central Government that the Master Plan for Delhi be amended or a fresh Master Plan be formulated and released at the earliest, to declare all areas with more than 70% industrial units as industrial areas to avoid the sense of panic among the people attached with such units. Save employment and provide them relief."  
03 26.09.2005

5th

Dr. S.C.Vats "That all unorganised labour, whether in construction, Industrial or other unorganised sectors be issued appointment letters to avoid their exploitation at the hands of unscrupulous employer.  This house further agrees that all such labourers  must be paid as per the minimum wages act in order to stop their exploitation"  
04 20.12.2005

6th

Shri Mukesh Sharma "This House resolves that all the constructions and shops etc. running in the residential area of Delhi may be regularized in the public interest and also dissolves to stop demolition with immediate effects"  
05 09.11.2006

9th

Shri Mukesh Sharma "This House moves that considering future of the capital before finalization of Delhi Master Plan 2020 -21, it is very essential to have discussion on the purposed Delhi Master Plan in the House.   At the same time, it is realized that elected representatives be associated with the purposed Delhi Master Plan.  Therefore House request DDA and other concerned authorities to send the purposed Master Plan to this House immediately for consideration"  

 

Second Assembly

S.No. Date Session

Name of the mover

Text of the Motion adopted by the House

Remarks

1 21st March 2003

16th

Shri Nand Kishore Garg

“In accordance with the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and toperform the duties of an ideal public representative, this House resolves that all Members of this House should declare for the general public, their educational, financial and criminal antecedents if any, through the Hon’ble Speaker every year.”

 
02 28th November 2002

15th

Dr. (Smt) Kiran Walia

In order to improve and provide better governance to the people of Delhi, this House recommends that multiplicity of authorities be removed and all developmental, administrative agencies be brought under single command and control of the Chief Minister of Delhi

 
03 26th November 2002

15th

Shri Arvinder Singh Lovely “This House expresses its strong concern over the attempt of the Central Government to politicize Delhi Police in such a way that officers are compelled to act on the wishes of local BJP leaders. This should be stopped immediately.

This House further resolves and expresses serious concern over the increasing incidence of violence against women in the capital. To combat this malaise, this House resolves that projection of TV films, which highlight violence and brutality, or glamorize themes striking at the root of stable family relationships, should be eschewed.

This House also resolves that the police be appropriately sensitized and equipped to generate confidence amongst the women in the Capital, and promptly and sympathetically respond in cases involving atrocities against women.

Further, this House conveys to the electronic and print media, its strong concern over the repeated projection of news on violent incidents in the country, in a manner which could incite violent and heinous reactions against particular communities, and appeals to them for responsible  and restrained reporting.”

The debate was initiated as as a short duration discussion. As the Chair ruled that the Motion could not be taken up unless rules in this regard were suspended, Shri Ajay Maken, Minister of Transport and Power, moved under Rule 290 seeking suspension of Rules concerning Motions.

04 11th September 2003

14th Special Session

Dr. AK Walia Minister of Urban Development “ This House expresses its resolve that Government of NCT of Delhi be granted Statehood by bringing about major institutional and structural reforms based on broad consensus to empower the citizens of Delhi through their elected representatives to provide good city governance befitting the National Capital of our country.”  
04 11th September 2002 14th (Special) Smt. Sheila Dikshit, Chief Minister “I.          This House expresses its deep anguish and concern over the unilateral action taken by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India vide its letter of July 25, 2002 and order of August 29, 2002-

i.                     This House notes that the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India vide its letter of July 25, 2002 (No. U- 11013/12/95-UTL) has indicated that the Central Government has decided that the word ‘Government’ in relation to NCT of Delhi should not be defined as ‘Government of the NCT of Delhi’ as it introduces a new and independent legal entity not known in the Constitution.  Moreover it may lead to an impression that there is a government other than the Central Government for the NCT of Delhi.

ii.                   This House further notes that the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India vide its order of August 29, 2002 (No. U-11013/2/2002-UTL) has conveyed the decision of the President to amend the Transaction of Business of the Government of the NCT of Delhi Rules, 1993 – 

ii.a.    in rule 23-

i.        For the opening words “The following classes of proposals or matters shall be submitted to the Lieutenant Governor”, the following shall be substituted, namely: -

“The following classes of proposals or matters shall essentially be submitted to the Lieutenant Governor” 

    ii.         after clause (v), the following clause shall be inserted, namely :-

“(va) matters on which the Lieutenant Governor is required to make orders under any law or instrument in force”.

ii.b.    In sub-rule (1) of rule 55 of the said rules: -  

i.  For the word “Bill” appearing in the opening portion, the words “legislative proposal” shall be substituted; 

ii. For clause (a), the following clause shall be substituted, namely:-

“(a) If introduced in a Bill form and enacted by the Legislative Assembly, is required to be reserved for the consideration of the President under the proviso to sub-clause (c) of clause (3) of article 239AA or, under the second proviso to section 24 of the Act, as the case may be;” 

The House condemns this decision of the Home Ministry taken without consulting the popularly elected Delhi Government.  This House is of the view that these orders are in total violation of all democratic traditions and harmonious relations between the Centre and the States.  This House resolves that there can be only one definition of the government for legislative and any other purpose and this is the ‘Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi’.  Moreover, amendment of rules 23 & 55(1) cannot take away what the Constitution (69th Amendment) Act and the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1992 have sought to give to the people of Delhi.  This House therefore resolves that the above two unilateral orders aimed at curtailing the powers of a duly elected popular government should in the first instance be immediately withdrawn by the Central Government.

*****************

The Legislative Assembly takes note of the special provision made by the Constitution of India vide the 69th Amendment Act.  Article 239 AA of the constitution gives Delhi the special status as the National Capital Territory of Delhi.  This is reinforced as the reference to Delhi from Article 240 – “Power of President to make regulations for certain Union Territories” – has also been removed.  It is an undisputed fact that the National Capital Territory of Delhi is a legal creation of the Constitution and enjoys a special status.  This House resolves that this special status of the Government of NCT of Delhi has to be recognized, accepted and respected by the Central Government.

************************

III.    The Legislative Assembly takes cognizance of the fact that constitutionally the Lt. Governor of Delhi is entrusted with three and only three reserved powers i.e. powers with respect to Entries 1,2 and 18 of the State List and the directly related Entries 64-66 of the same List (Art. 239 AA [3][a]), Constitution of India). This spirit of the Constitution is reiterated in the Government of NCT of Delhi Act, 1992 and the Transaction of Business Rules, 1993 and as amended in 1998. Any exercise of powers beyond the aforesaid limited three subjects by any amendment to any rule is directly violative of the Constitution of India and hence ultra vires.  This House resolves that in respect of transferred subjects the Lt. Governor should act only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. 

************************

III.    The Legislative Assembly takes note of the fact that as per Rule 45 of the Transaction of Business Rules the Lieutenant Governor shall in respect of maters connected with ‘Police’, ‘Public Order’ and ‘Land’ exercise his executive functions to the extent delegated to him by the President, in consultation with the Chief Minister, if it is so provided under any order issued by the President under Article 239 of the Constitution.  This Constitution with the Chief Minister as envisaged in the Rules is mandatory.  In the absence of this consultation the decision making process in respect of these subjects is devoid of the advice of the elected representatives.  This House resolves that such mandatory consultation on reserved subjects should take place and the Lt. Governor and the Central Government should without fail give due consideration to the views of the elected Government in the spirit of democracy.”

 


 

Close